BugSmash: The best Feedbucket alternative

Q: Does Feedbucket have a free plan?

No. Feedbucket offers a fourteen day trial and then paid plans from $49 a month, or $39 billed yearly. BugSmash has a free plan with no expiry and no credit card, covering two projects and unlimited guest reviewers.

Q: How much does Feedbucket cost?

Pro is $49 a month, or $39 billed yearly, covering two team members and five active projects. Business is $89 a month with twenty five team members, unlimited projects, console logs and custom branding. Enterprise is custom priced.

Q: Do I have to install anything on my client site to use Feedbucket?

Yes. Feedbucket runs from a script embedded in each site you review, which also needs removing before launch. BugSmash reviews a live site from a pasted URL, with the widget as an option rather than a requirement.

Q: Can Feedbucket review PDFs, video or designs?

No. Feedbucket collects feedback on live websites, including annotated screenshots and screen recordings from the reviewer. PDFs, video, audio, mobile apps, 3D models and CAD drawings are outside its scope.

Q: Which is cheaper, Feedbucket or BugSmash?

It depends on your size. Below about twelve people BugSmash is cheaper, and a freelancer pays nothing against $49. At twenty five people Feedbucket Business at $89 with branding included is cheaper than BugSmash Agency at $129.

Q: Can I review a website I do not control with Feedbucket?

Not without adding the script, which needs access to the site. BugSmash reviews any publicly reachable URL without touching the site, which matters for pitches, audits and inherited client work.

Q: Is Feedbucket worth it in 2026?

For a web-only agency that has already committed and controls its client sites, yes, and its users rate it highly for exactly that. For anyone still evaluating, or reviewing work beyond websites, the absence of a free plan and the narrow scope are what usually end it.

Paste the URL. Nothing to add to the site, nothing to remove before launch.

Feedbucket needs a script embedded in every site you review, and taken back out before that site goes live. BugSmash opens the page from a pasted URL inside BugSmash, so there is nothing to deploy, nothing to chase a developer for, and nothing left on a client site at launch. It also reviews twelve things that are not a website.

Start free, no card required See the full comparison

4.8 out of 5 · 1,250+ agencies in 100+ countries

Loved by1,250+Agenciesand companies in 100+ countries

BugSmash is the closest Feedbucket alternative for agencies that do not want a script on client sites.

Both collect annotated client feedback on a live page and push it into a project tool. Feedbucket works by embedding a snippet in each site, which has to be installed before a review starts and removed before the site goes live. BugSmash opens the site from a pasted URL, and reviews video, audio, PDFs, mobile apps, 3D and CAD as well as web.

Feature	Feedbucket	BugSmash
To start a review	Embed a script in the site	Paste the URL
Before the site goes live	Remove the script	Nothing to remove
Sites you do not control	Cannot be reviewed	Any public URL
Free plan	None, 14 day trial	Free forever, no card
Unlimited projects	$89/mo Business	$25/mo for 50, $69 unlimited
Asset types	Websites	13, including video, audio, 3D and CAD

What is Feedbucket?

Feedbucket is a website feedback tool built by former web agency owners. A script embedded in the site lets clients leave annotated screenshots and screen recordings directly on the page without an account, and each comment lands in Trello, Jira, Asana, ClickUp or GitHub.

It is deliberately narrow: websites only, two paid plans and no free tier. Its reviews consistently praise reliability and the absence of clutter.

PRIMARY USE CASES

Client feedback on websites you build and control
Annotated screenshots and screen recordings from reviewers
Pushing website issues into an existing project tool
Simple agency review cycles with no configuration

Why agencies outgrow Feedbucket

Feedbucket is well built and very well liked, and we say why further down. Nothing below argues that it collects feedback badly. It argues that the way it attaches to a site creates work at both ends of every project, and that it only ever covers one of the things your client reviews.

A script goes on the site, and has to come back off

Feedbucket collects feedback by embedding a snippet in the page. That is what makes the comments land accurately, and it is also two jobs bolted onto every project.

The first is at the start. Before a client can leave a single comment, the snippet has to be added to the site, which means access, a deploy, and sometimes waiting on whoever owns the hosting. A review that should take five minutes to set up takes as long as the next release window.

The second is at the end, and it is the one that actually bites. The snippet has to be taken out before the site goes live. Nobody schedules that, it sits in a launch checklist, and the failure mode agencies report is not forgetting to add the script. It is forgetting to remove it, and shipping a client's live site with a feedback widget still attached to it.

There is also work you simply cannot take on. A prospect's existing site, a competitor page you want to mark up, an inherited build hosted by someone else: none of it can be reviewed, because you cannot put code on a site you do not control.

Websites, and only websites

Video cuts, audio edits, PDFs, decks, mobile builds, 3D models and CAD drawings all go somewhere else. For a studio that does web alongside brand and campaign work, that is a second tool and a split history.

No free plan at all

There is a fourteen day trial and then nothing. For a freelancer running one client project a month, or anyone who wants to pilot a tool on a real project before committing budget, there is no way to keep using it without paying.

Two people and five active projects for $49

Pro is $49 a month, or $39 billed yearly, and covers two team members and five active projects. An agency with three people or six live client builds is already on Business at $89.

The step itself is reasonable. What catches people is that the entry plan is priced like a team plan and shaped like a freelancer plan.

What does not change when you switch

The real worry about changing review tool is never whether the new one is better. It is whether your client will refuse to use it. Nothing you ask of your clients changes.

Still no login

Clients open the link and comment. No account, no password, no install.

Still one link

Paste it into the email you were already writing.

Still pinned to the work

Click the exact spot, type, reply in a thread.

Still folders and share controls

Organise by client, control who can view or comment, get notified when they do.

BugSmash and Feedbucket: quick comparison

The short version. The detailed comparison is underneath.

Feature	Feedbucket	BugSmash
Entry price	$49/mo (2 users, 5 projects)	$0, then $25/mo (2 users included)
To start a review	Embed a script in the site	Paste the URL
Before the site goes live	The script has to come off	Nothing to remove
Sites you do not control	Cannot be reviewed	Any public URL
Free plan	None, 14 day trial	Yes, no card
File types reviewed	Websites	13

BugSmash vs Feedbucket: detailed comparison

BugSmash vs Feedbucket: detailed comparison
Feature	Feedbucket	BugSmash
SETUP
Starting a review	Embed a script in the site, then wait for a deploy	Paste the URL, the site opens inside BugSmash
Reviewing a site you do not control	Not possible, you cannot install the script	Any publicly reachable URL
Before the site goes live	The script has to be removed	Nothing to remove
Optional in-page mode	The only mode	Widget, for JavaScript heavy or protected builds
COST AND LIMITS
Free plan	None	2 projects, 2 people, unlimited guests
Trial	14 days	Not needed, the free plan is permanent
Entry price	$49/mo (2 users, 5 projects)	$0, then $25/mo (2 users included)
People on the entry plan	2	2, then 10 on Team
Active projects on the entry plan	5	50
Unlimited projects	$89/mo Business	$69/mo Team
People on the second plan	25	10 on Team, 25 on Agency
Extra seats	Not published	$5 each
WHAT YOU CAN REVIEW
Live websites and web apps	Yes	Yes
Screen recordings from the reviewer	Yes	Yes
PDFs, images, decks, documents	No	Yes
Video and audio with timestamps	No	Yes
Native mobile apps	No	Yes
3D models and CAD drawings	No	Yes
WHAT YOUR CLIENT SEES
Comment without an account	Yes	Yes
Custom branding	Business, $89	Team, $69
Your own domain and email	Not published	Agency, $129
Review page in the reviewer's language	Not published	20+ languages from Team
AFTER THE COMMENT
Trello, Jira, Asana, ClickUp, GitHub	Yes	Yes
Console logs attached	Business, $89	Browser, OS, device and selector on every plan
Automated review before a human looks	No	Accessibility, UI, copy, broken links
Hand open comments to an AI agent	Not published	Yes, over MCP
Single sign-on	Not published	Enterprise
WHERE FEEDBUCKET IS STRONGER
Price at twenty five people	$89 with 25 members and branding	$129 on Agency
Simplicity	Deliberately minimal, consistently praised for it	More surface area to learn
In-page accuracy	Script runs inside the real page	Matched only when you use the widget
Built by former agency owners	Yes, and it shows in the workflow	Different origin

What you would pay

If this is you	Feedbucket	BugSmash	Difference a year
Freelancer, 2 clients	$49	$0	$588
Solo, 8 live projects	$89	$25	$768
Five person studio	$89	$40	$588
Twelve person agency	$89	$79	$120
Twenty five people, branding	$89	$129	$480

The gap is at the bottom and closes as the team grows. Feedbucket is priced for an established agency that has already decided. If you are smaller, or still deciding, the absence of a free plan is what you run into first.

View BugSmash Plans & Pricing

What you get that Feedbucket does not have

A review that starts with a paste, not a deploy

Paste the URL and the client's site opens inside BugSmash with the comment layer already on it. No snippet, no access request, no waiting for a release window, and nothing sitting on the site at launch for someone to notice. You can also review a site you do not own, which is what makes pitches, audits and inherited client work possible at all.

The widget is there if you want the in-page version for a JavaScript heavy app or a build behind a login. It is a choice you make per project, not the price of entry.

A free plan you can put in front of a real client

Two projects, unlimited guest reviewers, unlimited comments, no credit card and no fourteen day clock. Run a whole client project through it before spending anything.

Twelve more asset types

Video and audio with timeline comments, PDFs, decks, Word documents, images, email builds, raw HTML, native mobile apps, 3D models and CAD drawings, alongside live websites.

Fifty projects for $25

Against five projects for $49. For a studio running several client builds at once, that is the difference between choosing which projects are allowed to be open and not thinking about it.

When you should choose Feedbucket

BugSmash is the better fit if

You cannot or will not put code on a client's site
You want to review sites you do not control, for pitches or audits
Clients review more than websites
You want to try it on a real client before paying
You need the review to carry your own domain

Feedbucket is the better fit if

You review websites and nothing else
You control every site you touch and deploying is easy
You want the simplest possible tool with nothing to learn
You have twenty five people and want branding at $89

If you review websites and nothing else, you control every site you touch and can deploy to it freely, and you want the simplest possible tool with no surface area to learn, Feedbucket is a genuinely good choice. The in-page script is also more accurate inside complex applications than any proxy, which is a real engineering advantage and not a quirk. It was built by people who ran agencies, it shows in the workflow, and its users are unusually consistent about reliability and the absence of clutter.

At twenty five people it is also cheaper than we are, with branding included at $89. If that is your size and websites are your whole scope, we would understand the decision.

If you want to try before paying, cannot put code on client sites, or review anything beyond web, keep reading.

Why are teams switching toBugSmash

Everything you didn't know you needed, until now.

Get Started, It's Free

Switching takes an afternoon, not a weekend

Feedbucket feedback already flows into your project tool, so much of your history is in Jira, ClickUp or Asana rather than locked in the review tool.

Start free and put your next new project in BugSmash. Do not move history. New work only.
Send one client the link. No account for them means no email explaining a signup, which is the step that usually kills a tool change.
Leave Feedbucket running until your billing period ends. Finish the reviews already in flight over there.
Remove the Feedbucket script from sites as you retire them. Worth doing deliberately rather than finding it later.
Cancel once the last one closes. Nothing is stranded, because nothing moved.

Other Feedbucket alternatives worth knowing about

BugHerd

Strong bug triage board with unlimited projects and guests. Needs a script on the site or an extension in each reviewer's browser.

Marker.io

Two-way sync with Jira, Linear and GitHub, with status flowing back to the reporter. Built for engineers rather than clients.

MarkUp.io

Simple canvas-style review on live sites, images, PDFs and video, unlimited users on every plan. Pro is metered at 100 reviews a month and the next plan is $499.

Pastel

The most reliable live website rendering in the category. Meters active canvases and charges $24 a seat above five people.

Ruttl

Edits CSS and content directly in the browser while you review. $18 per user from the first user.

Still comparing?

We keep a page on every tool in this category, including the ones that beat us in places. See all comparisons

Questions people ask before switching

What is the best Feedbucket alternative?

If the missing free plan or the five project limit is the problem, BugSmash is the closest replacement and adds twelve asset types beyond websites. If you want a fuller bug triage board and do not mind a script, BugHerd is the closer like-for-like.

Does Feedbucket have a free plan?

How much does Feedbucket cost?

Do I have to install anything on my client site to use Feedbucket?

Can Feedbucket review PDFs, video or designs?

Which is cheaper, Feedbucket or BugSmash?

Can I review a website I do not control with Feedbucket?

Is Feedbucket worth it in 2026?

Get your unbilled hours back

Start today, it's free

Set up your first review in under a minute. No credit card, no onboarding calls.

Start Now, it's Free Talk to us